Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“Please do not rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This rule is integral to maintaining healthy…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24
  • 17 submissions
  • 5 versions of the text
  • 0 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Oct 5Oct 6

Oct 5: 12 submissions, 1 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-567190, the comment that stands for the group.

Please do not rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This rule is integral to maintaining healthy wildlife populations and habitat and provides irreplaceable recreation opportunities for Americans. This rule was overwhelmingly popular when it was put in place and remains so today. The Roadless Rule was developed through one of the largest public participation efforts in federal land management history, generating approximately 1.6 million public comments, 99% of which were in support of the rule. Roadless does not mean unmanaged and this current rule does not prohibit hunting, fishing, grazing, recreation, habitat restoration, hazardous fuels reduction, wildfire mitigation, mining, or access to valid existing rights. Adding roads to an already overloaded maintenance backlog does not make fiscal sense and is a bad deal for wildlife and people alike. USFS currently manages approximately 370,000 miles of roads and faces a deferred maintenance backlog of roughly $10.8 billion, with ~55% of that backlog tied to roads alone. The idea that building roads into the backcountry will help with fire suppression is unsupported and in fact will lead to more fires. Keep this rule in place so that future generations of Americans can enjoy the wilds that define our country. I respectfully urge the Forest Service to adopt the no action alternative and keep the 2001 Roadless Rule in place. Don't bulldoze the backcountry. Defend the Roadless Rule.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless