Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I strongly oppose any changes to the Roadless Rule that would allow additional roads, development, or…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24
  • 58 submissions
  • 23 versions of the text
  • 6 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Oct 6

Oct 6: 58 submissions, 1 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-593883, the comment that stands for the group.

I strongly oppose any changes to the Roadless Rule that would allow additional roads, development, or commercial activity in currently protected roadless areas on our national forests. As an environmental conservationist, I believe our remaining undeveloped public lands are among our nation’s most valuable natural resources. Roadless areas provide critical wildlife habitat, protect clean water, preserve biodiversity, store carbon, and offer opportunities for recreation and solitude that cannot be replaced once development occurs. Building roads into these areas creates impacts that extend far beyond the physical footprint of the road itself, including habitat fragmentation, erosion, invasive species, increased human access, and pressure for further development. Once an intact landscape is opened to development, its wilderness character and ecological values are extremely difficult to restore. Our national lands should be managed for the long-term public interest, not short-term opportunities for additional extraction or development. I urge the agency to maintain the existing Roadless Rule and reject proposals that would weaken protections for roadless national forest lands. Please protect these remaining intact landscapes for future generations rather than opening them to additional development.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless