Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. Our national forests are public lands, our…”

Small family: One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24

5 submissions
5 versions of the text
4 added words of their own

TopicsEnvironmental Protection Biodiversity Recreation Tourism Public Use Water Quality Quantity

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Oct 5Oct 6

Oct 6: 4 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

National Forests: + Monongahela National Forest
Roadless areas: Cheat MountainSeneca Creek

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-572712, the comment that stands for the group.

I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. Our national forests are public lands, our shared birthright, and they should be protected for the benefit of everyone, not opened to greater roadbuilding and commercial logging. In West Virginia, the Roadless Rule safeguards treasured places like Roaring Plains, Seneca Creek, Cheat Mountain, Canaan Mountain and Tea Creek, while protecting important buffers around Dolly Sods, Otter Creek and Cranberry. These wild, unfragmented landscapes provide clean water, wildlife habitat and irreplaceable opportunities for outdoor recreation. Once they are lost, we cannot easily restore them. Please preserve the Roadless Rule and protect our shared public lands for future generations.

← All campaigns