Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I strongly oppose the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I live near / recreate…”

Small family: One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24

4 submissions
3 versions of the text
1 added words of their own

TopicsEnvironmental Protection Biodiversity Forest Management Wildfire Recreation Tourism Public Use Water Quality Quantity

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 28Oct 6

Oct 6: 3 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

Roadless areas: Castle Peak+ Caples Creek+ Granite Chief

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-601578, the comment that stands for the group.

I strongly oppose the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I live near / recreate in the West Shore of Lake Tahoe, Castle Peak. These roadless forests protect clean water, provide the quiet backcountry experiences I value, and support the outdoor recreation that sustains our local economy. The Roadless Rule already allows important wildfire resilience work — nearly 250,000 acres have been treated in California roadless areas since 2001. Removing the national protections would open these last intact forests to new roads and industrial logging at a time when agency capacity for careful planning and public engagement is already stretched. Please keep the Roadless Rule in place.

← All campaigns