Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-226083

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Posted August 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A0 none: Counted, not answered.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands”
    • “Our family hikes these wilderness areas on yearly vacations”
    • “hiking the trails exposes us to a world not known in human cities”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “value the pristine wildlife habitats”
    • “Each sighting of moose, bears, elk, sandhill cranes”
    • “wilderness has its value to human lives”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
    • “Protecting these unfragmented landscapes”
    • “maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas”

What it names

National Forests
Caribou-Targhee National Forest

Attachments

4 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter

The comment

To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As an avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands, I rely heavily on the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I frequently visit the Bridger-Teton Nation Forest, GrosVentre Wilderness area, the Caribou-Targhee National Forest and the Jedediah Smith Wilderness in Wyoming and Idaho. Our family hikes these wilderness areas on yearly vacations. Protecting these unfragmented landscapes is deeply personal to me because I hiking the trails exposes us to a world not known in human cities. I cherish the wild flowers and value the pristine wildlife habitats. Each sighting of moose, bears, elk, sandhill cranes etc is proof that wilderness has its value to human lives. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Sincerely, Jayne Boyer 4316 Thetford Rd Durham, NC 27707

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless