Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-245880

Supports rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Posted August 22, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A0 none: Counted, not answered.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “50,000 acres have burnt because the trees just lay on top of one another”
    • “These fires destroy our national forest”
    • “The forest service let these fires burn because they were in the wilderness study area”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “The federal government has no right to totally destroy our national forest”
    • “The forest service needs to be revamped or turned over to DNRC for each state to manage the national forest”
    • “The local government not to forest service maintains the trails”

What it names

Roadless areas
Pioneer MountainsWilderness Study Area

Attachments

3 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter

The comment

Resend the roadless rule. The federal government has no right to totally destroy our national forest. For the last 50 years since 1977 with the wilderness study in the pioneer mountains are force turned into a nightmare this year alone 50,000 acres have burnt because the trees just lay on top of one another. These fires destroy our national forest and wildlife. This needs to stop now. The local government not to forest service maintains the trails that we do use. The forest service let these fires burn because they were in the wilderness study area and they got away from them.. just about the whole west side of the pioneer mountains in the last two years have been destroyed. The forest service needs to be revamped or turned over to DNRC for each state to manage the national forest.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless