Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-274541

Opposes rescissionA3 weakSubstance 11/24Owed an answerPosted August 27, 2026 On Regulations.gov

In short: The comment documents that the rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule would remove the primary buffer for the Bog Turtle in the Tusquitee Bald IRA, citing specific threat classifications and scientific data on the importance of IRAs for wildlife species of conservation concern.

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A3 weak: Substantive, but easier to set aside.

Owed an answer on Analytical gap, Evidence.

Standard dismissals it defeats

  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “Silence away from engines is not an accident”
    • “peace and quiet that roadless areas provide”
    • “immersed myself in the beauty of a quiet forest”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii, G2)”
    • “loses its primary buffer against 4.2 - Utility & service lines”
    • “Road construction in Tusquitee Bald introduces sediment, alters hydrology”
  • Public Health Wellbeing
    • “imperative to my mental health”
    • “opportunity to be alone in this beautiful area”
  • Scientific Research Evidence
    • “use the best available scientific data”
    • “NatureServe conservation status ranks and IUCN-CMP threat classifications”
    • “Global Ecology and Conservation (ScienceDirect), 2021”

What it names

National Forests
Nantahala National Forest
Roadless areas
Tusquitee Bald

The comment

To the Roadless Rule Rulemaking Docket: Silence away from engines is not an accident. It takes a rule like this one to maintain it. I moved to this area specifically because of the peace and quiet that roadless areas provide. The opportunity to be alone in this beautiful area is imperative to my mental health. That attachment rests on particular days, and one of them is worth describing. I recently hiked in the Tusquittee Bald area. After driving for miles on existing USFS roads I made it to a trailhead and immersed myself in the beauty of a quiet forest, only available because of the Roadless Rule. These two facets of my connection to the lands at issue together constitute the basis of my opposition to the proposed rescission. Regarding the Tusquitee Bald in the Nantahala National Forest, North Carolina: Without the protections of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii, G2) in the Tusquitee Bald Inventoried Roadless Area, Nantahala National Forest, loses its primary buffer against 4.2 - Utility & service lines, assessed at Unknown severity across Small (1-10%) scope. Road construction in Tusquitee Bald introduces sediment, alters hydrology, and delivers chemical contaminants to adjacent habitats — the direct physical drivers of 4.2 - Utility & service lines. The agency must use the best available scientific data — including NatureServe conservation status ranks and IUCN-CMP threat classifications — when analyzing impacts of rescission on Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) in the Tusquitee Bald IRA. "Of the 537 wildlife species of conservation concern in CONUS, 308 species (57%) have at least some suitable habitat in one or more inventoried roadless areas (IRAs). The median IRA contains suitable habitat for 10 wildlife species of conservation concern, with a maximum of 62 wildlife SCCs. Despite their geographic and elevational clustering and predominance of a single biome type, IRAs provide a larger proportion of suitable habitat for multiple wildlife SCCs than non-IRA CONUS lands. If all IRAs were added to the protected-area system in CONUS, there would be a substantial decrease (−38) in the number of wildlife SCCs that are currently considered 'poorly represented' in protected areas." — Global Ecology and Conservation (ScienceDirect), 2021 The Rule has served as a stable policy framework for more than two decades; the Department should not disturb it. Most respectfully, Maretta Mott CommentID: RLC-20260826-ZLMUYK

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless