In short: The comment establishes that the agency's programmatic analysis is insufficient because it fails to evaluate specific fire and fire suppression impacts on Monarch habitat at the Mogan Ridge Inventoried Roadless Area, citing 2021 scientific data on the conservation value of IRAs and the commenter's 27-year residency in the Hoosier National Forest to demonstrate concrete harm.
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
- Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
- Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
- EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
- Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
- EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
- RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
- AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
- LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A3 weak: Substantive, but easier to set aside.
Owed an answer on Analytical gap, Evidence.
Standard dismissals it defeats
- Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
- Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
Still open to the agency
- Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
- Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
- Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
Topics
- Wildlife Habitat
- “diversity of its flora and fauna”
- “Monarch (Danaus plexippus, G4, PT) in the Mogan Ridge IRA”
- “537 wildlife species of conservation concern in CONUS”
- “IRAs provide a larger proportion of suitable habitat for multiple wildlife SCCs”
- Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “appreciate the benefits of its wildness”
- “introduction of invasive species”
- “concentrate human disturbance along corridors”
- “substantial decrease (-38) in the number of wildlife SCCs”
- Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “uses public land regularly”
- “respite to those of us who dwell in cities and towns”
- “serves as a lung to southern indiana”
- Legal Regulatory Framework
- “A programmatic analysis is insufficient”
- “The DEIS must evaluate 7.1 - Fire & fire suppression impacts”
- “survived twenty-five years, multiple administrations, and repeated judicial review”
The comment
Shaded passages are the ones the analysis quoted as evidence for a dimension: Legal