In short: The comment documents a specific contradiction between the rule's small-business certification and its own DEIS/CBA data regarding economic impacts on local outfitters, and requests site-specific environmental analysis for eight named roadless areas in the Jefferson National Forest.
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
- Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
- Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
- EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
- Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
- EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
- RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
- AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
- LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A3 weak: Substantive, but easier to set aside.
Owed an answer on Analytical gap, Evidence.
Standard dismissals it defeats
- Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
- Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
Still open to the agency
- Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
- Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
- Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
Topics
- Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “flora and fauna that inhabit this region need a place to thrive”
- “harming habitats”
- “treasure those trips”
- “wilderness”
- Water Quality Quantity
- “ruining watersheds”
- “Clean water is life”
- “access to clean water”
- “causing erosion”
- Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “I hiked in may of these regions”
- “small outfitters and guides”
- “lost recreation benefit”
- “I hike and camp in these areas”
- Legal Regulatory Framework
- “small-business certification contradicts the analysis”
- “regulatory flexibility analysis”
- “analyze in the DEIS an alternative”
- “provide a reasoned explanation for it on the record”
What it names
- National Forests
- Jefferson National Forest
- Roadless areas
- Broad RunBrush MountainBrush Mountain EastBrushy MountainNorth MountainPatterson Mountain
The comment
Shaded passages are the ones the analysis quoted as evidence for a dimension: Analytical gapEvidenceRequestLegal