Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-289264

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 7/24Posted August 31, 2026 On Regulations.gov

In short: The comment establishes that the Shenandoah Mountain National Scenic Areas contains five specific roadless areas totaling 70,000 acres, which represent the largest concentration of roadless areas in the eastern US and provide critical benefits for clean water, outdoor recreation, and wildlife habitat.

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A0 none: Counted, not answered.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Gum RunLittle RiverOak KnobRamseys Draft Addition

The comment

Shaded passages are the ones the analysis quoted as evidence for a dimension: Legal

I am writing to implore you NOT to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This Rule would open our National Forest roadless areas across the nation for new roads, logging, and other development. Why is this important to all of us in the Shenandoah Valley? The proposed Shenandaoh Mountain National Scenic Areas has 5 roadless areas totally 70,000 acres: Oak Knob, Gum Run, Skidmore Fork, Little River, and Ramseys Draft Addition. Together these comprise the largest concentration of roadless areas in the eastern US. The map shows these and other roadless areas in the GWNF North River District. We have been working for 25 years to gain permanent protection for the SMNSA for three primary benefits: clean water, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat. This action could undermine all the progress we have made. Don't surrender in this fight or you will be replaced by someone who understands what is at stake & will fight for the environment & us

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless