In short: The comment places on the record specific geographic coordinates for the Ashley National Forest in Utah and asserts that the proposed roadless area repeal is based on a false premise regarding wildfire reduction, specifically citing that 90% of wildfires start within 1/2 mile of a road.
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
- Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
- Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
- EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
- Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
- EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
- RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
- AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
- LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A0 none: Counted, not answered.
Still open to the agency
- Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
- Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
- Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
- Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
- Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
Topics
- Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “As a hunter who has spent several seasons exploring and enjoying the Ashley National Forest”
- “The greatest joys I have experienced outdoors have come from exploring where the roads end and elk trails begin”
- “uniquely American privilege to have access to so much land that in many ways remains as wild and untamed”
- Forest Management Wildfire
- “blatantly false pretense of reducing wildfires”
- “90% of all wildfires start with 1/2 mile of road”
- Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “staunch conservationists”
- “remains as wild and untamed as it was a thousand years ago”
- “travesty and atrocity committed against future generations”
Attachments
3 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.
- Own letter
- Own letter
- Own letter
The comment
Shaded passages are the ones the analysis quoted as evidence for a dimension: Analytical gapEvidenceAlternativeLegal