Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Posted September 2, 2026 On Regulations.gov
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A0 none: Counted, not answered.
Still open to the agency
Alternative already eliminatedThe agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Already addressedThe agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
Deferred to a later decisionThe agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Misreads the proposalThe agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
Not requiredThe agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
Preference notedThe agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
No cause and effect shownThe agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
Outside the scopeThe agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
Certified not substantiveThe agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
I strongly appose any changes to the current roadless rule. I am a hunter, backcountry skier, climber and conservationist. I recreate regularly in current roadless areas throughout utah, montana, and wyoming. In Utah I hunt and backcountry ski on the western side of the Uinta national forest near Kamas UT. Specifically near Hoyt peak, which is currently under protection of the current roadless rule. This area is special because it is true wilderness, leading to a rare and incredible backcountry experience in rugged country. Keeping this area free from development, and conserving current old growth trees, native plant species and water sources are vital for maintaining current ecological health of the greater utah ecosystem and helping prevent destructive wildfires. Along with maintaining a place to recreate that is still truly wild. Which is what makes the great forests of the united states unique. If the roadless rule is removed, you can count on me doing everything in my voting power to make sure a candidate in the future is put into office that will reinstate the rule and further enhance protections for public and protected landscapes.