Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-308279

Opposes rescissionA2 moderateSubstance 4/24Owed an answerPosted September 3, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A2 moderate: Hard to dismiss — it shows cause and effect.

Owed an answer on Alternative.

Standard dismissals it defeats

  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “keep a ban on permanent roads and regeneration harvest in core roadless areas”
    • “delete the national floor on 44.7 million acres”
    • “separate the Tongass”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “existing fuels exceptions are too hard to use”
    • “allow temporary roads and thinning only in mapped WUI and high-hazard stands”
    • “re-inventory compromised polygons”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “extend the comment period”
    • “I oppose full rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule”
    • “Do this instead”

The comment

I oppose full rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule. The rule is a blunt 2001 map, and the existing fuels exceptions are too hard to use. That is not a reason to delete the national floor on 44.7 million acres, including the Tongass. Do this instead: keep a ban on permanent roads and regeneration harvest in core roadless areas; allow temporary roads and thinning only in mapped WUI and high-hazard stands near existing roads; re-inventory compromised polygons; separate the Tongass; extend the comment period.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless