In short: The comment documents the specific request to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule by adopting the 'No Action' alternative, citing the lack of a required cost analysis regarding the $10 billion deferred maintenance backlog and the protection of core wildlife habitat in Wyoming.
Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.
Scorecard
Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.
- Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
- Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
- EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
- Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
- EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
- RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
- AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
- LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.
How hard it is to set aside
A0 none: Counted, not answered.
Still open to the agency
- Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
- Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
- Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
- No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
- Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
- Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.
Topics
- Wildlife Habitat
- “best, and last, fish and wildlife habitat”
- “core habitat for elk, mule deer, grizzly bear”
- “iconic Wyoming species”
- “spotted beaver and a moose”
- Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “trail, hunt and hike all over the Western Region”
- “spend time in the last remaining roadless spaces”
- “public land users”
- Economic Impact Fiscal
- “national debt has hit 40 trillion dollars”
- “Forest Service is already $10 billion behind in deferred maintenance”
- “adding roads not add to this massive maintenance back log”
- “cost analysis needs to be done”
- Public Opinion Support
- “wide-reaching public support”
- “99% of the public support the rule”
- “developed through years of public participation”
The comment
Shaded passages are the ones the analysis quoted as evidence for a dimension: EvidenceLegal