Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-417229

Opposes rescissionA2 moderateSubstance 5/24Owed an answerPosted September 16, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A2 moderate: Hard to dismiss — it shows cause and effect.

Owed an answer on Alternative.

Standard dismissals it defeats

  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “27 percent decline in our bird populations”
    • “crucial to the survival of birds, mammals, insects, plants”
    • “survival of intact ecosystems”
    • “woods are empty just a few species”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protect remaining undeveloped national forest lands”
    • “protect our National Forests”
    • “industrial development”
    • “adding an additional 45 million acres to the Roadless Area inventory”

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter

The comment

The Roadless Area Conservation Rule should not be overturned. Roadless areas were established p to protect remaining undeveloped national forest lands from commercial logging, new road construction, and industrial development. There is even more urgency today to protect our National Forests for the same reasons. Since 1970 there has been a 27 percent decline in our bird populations. I started watching birds in 1970 and my journals are full of observations of seeing birds in abundance. Now I visit forest areas, and the woods are empty just a few species. It is like walking in an empty city. The 44 million acres of roadless are crucial to the survival of birds, mammals, insects, plants and the survival of intact ecosystems. The focus should instead be on adding an additional 45 million acres to the Roadless Area inventory. Peter Gorman 4109 Half Moon Circle Silver City , New Mexico

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless