Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-436305

Supports rescissionA2 moderateSubstance 4/24Owed an answerPosted September 16, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Scored directly — The comment's whole text was scored on its own.

Scorecard

Each dimension is scored 0–3; the eight sum to the substance score out of 24.

  • Specific placeNames a specific location — from a region down to an exact creek, trail, road, or map reference.
  • Local knowledgeDraws on a first-hand connection to the place — visits, sustained activity, occupation, or a professional role.
  • EA analysisEngages the agency's environmental analysis directly.
  • Analytical gapIdentifies something the analysis fails to address.
  • EvidenceBacks claims with specific facts, data, or research.
  • RequestMakes a specific, actionable request of the agency.
  • AlternativeProposes a different course of action.
  • LegalCites statutes, regulations, or legal obligations.

How hard it is to set aside

A2 moderate: Hard to dismiss — it shows cause and effect.

Owed an answer on Alternative.

Standard dismissals it defeats

  • No cause and effect shown The agency says the comment asserts a harm without showing how the action causes it. Defeated when the comment shows the mechanism.

Still open to the agency

  • Alternative already eliminated The agency says it considered and eliminated the alternative the comment proposes, with a reason. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Already addressed The agency says its analysis already covers the point. Defeated when the comment cites the law itself: there is no analysis to cite against a statutory claim.
  • Deferred to a later decision The agency says the point belongs to a later, site-specific decision. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Misreads the proposal The agency says the comment misunderstands what is proposed. Defeated when the comment engages the proposal or a named place directly.
  • Not required The agency says the analysis the comment asks for is not required. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Preference noted The agency notes the comment as a statement of preference and takes no action on it. Cannot be defeated from the comment text alone.
  • Outside the scope The agency says the comment asks about a different action. Defeated when the comment is specific and tied to this proposal.
  • Certified not substantive The agency certifies the comment raises nothing substantive. Defeated when the comment alleges illegality, which is substantive by the definition the certification runs on.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “managed for the purposes for which they were intended”
    • “focus on habitat for ruffed grouse, migratory warblers”
    • “diversity of forest types and forest ages”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “I am a hunter, hiker, fisherman, naturalist and birdwatcher”
    • “benefits of having roads in our forests”
    • “exclude (or seasonally limit) public vehicular access”

The comment

I agree entirely with recinding the roadless rule to allow a greater portion of our National Forests to be managed for the purposes for which they were intended. I am a hunter, hiker, fisherman, naturalist and birdwatcher. Many of the species that I like to see depend on forest openings, young forests, early successional and managed habitats. I want to see more management done with a focus on habitat for ruffed grouse, migratory warblers, and other species that require a diversity of forest types and forest ages. I greatly appreciate the many benefits of having roads in our forests, but I would recommend that roughly half of them be maintained as administrative access roads that exclude (or seasonally limit) public vehicular access.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless