Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-456133

Opposes rescissionPosted September 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the rescinding of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I grew up in Colorado where some places are more accessible than others. This is as it should be. While I appreciate the sentiment of giving more control over access to the local areas, there is a trend in this administration to take action to the detriment of the stated intent. Right now this law provides a barrier to environmental destruction. Without it, we won't have it. I support the ‘no action’ alternative that would retain the 2001 Roadless Rule. Thank you, Krysta Coffey 1985 Rafes Way, Beaumont, TX 77706

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless