Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-456981

Opposes rescissionPosted September 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Hiawatha National ForestHuron-Manistee National ForestOttawa National Forest

The comment

I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. My name is Stephen Hoekwater and I live in Caledonia, Michigan. Public lands matter very much to me and I care deeply about the health of our lands and waters. I enjoy hiking, fishing, backpacking, and hunting and have done so in our National lands in Michigan and all throughout our county. Removing this beneficial regulation will harm our public lands. I have strong concerns that the current administration is moving ahead with energy and resource removal without consideration of the health of the land itself. For instance, if the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule were removed, timber harvesting would cause devastation to mature Forests that are a treasure we must protect. Those in leadership positions are not proving they are looking at the larger picture or the needs of future generations, but instead are seeking instant gains regardless of the harm it will cause. Areas I have particular concern for are those parts of National Forests in Michigan: Hiawatha National Forest, Huron-Manistee National Forest, and Ottawa National Forest. I urge you members of the U.S. Congress to oppose the proposal to rescind or alter the Roadless Rule,” and support “Alternative 1, the No Action alternative. Thank You, Stephen Hoekwater

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless