Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-457027

Opposes rescissionPosted September 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “ecosystems will be disturbed”
    • “negatively affecting hundreds of animals, plants, trees”
    • “contribute to the loss of species”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “affecting... waters”
    • “harm our clean water”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “decrease spaces for hiking, camping, hunting, and fishing”
    • “disrupting recreational access”
    • “reducing opportunities to generate income through nature-based tourism”

The comment

Hello USDA forest services, I live in Greeley, CO 80631 and I am against repealing the Roadless Rule. I am against repealing the Roadless Rule because ecosystems will be disturbed negatively affecting hundreds of animals, plants, trees, lands, and waters. Repealing this rule will contribute to the loss of species and harm our clean water. Repealing the Roadless Rule will also decrease spaces for hiking, camping, hunting, and fishing disrupting recreational access and therefore reducing opportunities to generate income through nature-based tourism.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless