Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-458789

Opposes rescissionPosted September 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “respect and love the natural environment”
    • “protected natural environment”
    • “let the wild stay wild”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “wildlife on that the land”
    • “disrupt it from being what it is intended to be”
    • “disturb the beauty of it”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “access to the water and land there is undisturbed”
    • “undisturbed by roads or infrastructure”

What it names

National Forests
Mark Twain National Forest

The comment

Dear USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to rescind or alter the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I own land that near the Mark Twain National Forest in Missouri. I respect and love the natural environment and the wildlife on that the land and I value that the access to the water and land there is undisturbed by roads or infrastructure. I don’t want any new or added roads going through that National Forest. That would disturb the beauty of it and disrupt it from being what it is intended to be which is a protected natural environment. If roads are built it will change the entire structure of what a protected national forest is intended to be. I don’t want my tax dollars used to pay for these changes. I am a retired teacher and as an educator and a responsible community member it would be painful to think that my tax payments would be supporting something so harmful, unnecessary and destructive. Please let the wild stay wild!! If you take it away, we cannot get it back!!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless