Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-458795

Opposes rescissionPosted September 21, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “Protection of Clean Drinking Water at the Source”
    • “Roadless areas act as natural filtration systems”
    • “severe soil erosion, sedimentation in our streams, and degraded water quality”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Preservation of Pristine Wilderness”
    • “critical, undisturbed habitats for wildlife, support biodiversity”
    • “fragment these ecosystems and destroy their pristine, wild character”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “Increased Wildfire Risk from Road Infrastructure”
    • “building new roads historically increases human-caused wildfire ignitions”
    • “introducing more access roads and industrial equipment into remote areas poses an unacceptable public safety risk”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “offer world-class quiet recreation”
    • “pristine, wild character”

What it names

National Forests
Siskiyou National Forests

The comment

Dear U.S. Forest Service Officials, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. As a resident of Siskiyou County, California, I am deeply concerned about how lifting these protections will permanently harm our local environment, our water supply, and our way of life. My opposition is rooted in the following critical issues: 1. Protection of Clean Drinking Water at the Source Siskiyou County contains the headwaters for vital watersheds that supply clean drinking water to our local communities and regions downstream. Roadless areas act as natural filtration systems. Allowing road construction and subsequent commercial logging in these pristine areas will inevitably lead to severe soil erosion, sedimentation in our streams, and degraded water quality. We must protect our water at the source. 2. Preservation of Pristine Wilderness The inventoried roadless areas within and surrounding Siskiyou County, including parts of the Klamath, Shasta-Trinity, and Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forests are irreplaceable. These lands provide critical, undisturbed habitats for wildlife, support biodiversity, and offer world-class quiet recreation. Rescinding the rule opens the door to industrial disruptions that will fragment these ecosystems and destroy their pristine, wild character. 3. Increased Wildfire Risk from Road Infrastructure While the agency suggests that rescinding the rule allows for better wildfire management, building new roads historically increases human-caused wildfire ignitions. In a region already highly vulnerable to catastrophic wildfires, introducing more access roads and industrial equipment into remote areas poses an unacceptable public safety risk to Siskiyou County residents. I urge the Forest Service and the Department of Agriculture to withdraw this proposal and maintain the strict protections of the 2001 Roadless Rule to ensure our water remains clean and our pristine wilderness stays wild. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, A Siskiyiu County Resident

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless