Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-467323

Opposes rescissionPosted September 22, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Dixie National ForestTongass National Forest

The comment

I support not only protecting the roadless rule, but extending it and increasing the total coverage of roadless area in the United States. Removing or reducing the roadless rule puts threat to many of the priceless wilderness areas of the United states. This will threaten the natural resources, biodiversity, beauty and recreational value of natural areas in the US from Tongass national Forest in Alaska to Dixie National Forest in Utah. Reduction of the roadless rule would be an irresponsible and irreparable mistake

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless