Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-467782

Opposes rescissionPosted September 22, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “multi use opportunities for the people of the United States”
    • “wealth of opportunity for recreation, hunting, fishing”
    • “peaceful enjoyment of the American people”
    • “take such opportunities away from the citizens”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “forward-thinking act of the federal government”
    • “Executive Order 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation”
    • “increase of wealth for the president, his family”
    • “goes against the foundation of the purpose of the federal government”

What it names

Law cited
Executive Order 14192

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter

The comment

The creation of roadless areas in 2001 was and still is a forward-thinking act of the federal government which provides multi use opportunities for the people of the United States along with visitors to the U.S. . It serves not only as a bank account for the American people, but also provides an incredible wealth of opportunity for recreation, hunting, fishing and peaceful enjoyment of the American people. To take such opportunities away from the citizens of the U.S. is shortsighted and is in accord with neither the American spirit nor the desires of us citizens. This is an emphatic “NO” to giving away our legacy. It is apparent to most US citizens that Executive Order 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation, is not about prosperity for “the people” of the U.S. but for the increase of wealth for the president, his family and those that bow down to him. This is not simply opinion, but a simple correlation one can make by looking at other executive orders and how they prioritize the production of wealth for the president and those in his close orbit. The production of wealth for this purpose goes against the foundation of the purpose of the federal government. For this reason alone, the proposed opening up of roadless areas should be rejected.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless