Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-470339

Opposes rescissionPosted September 22, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “protect freshwater resources”
    • “dangers to water quality”
    • “higher sediment loads”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “dangers to aquatic species”
    • “refugia for salmonids”
    • “freshwater biodiversity”
  • Scientific Research Evidence
    • “Literature synthesis shows”
    • “DellaSala, 2011”
    • “correlate with higher sediment loads”

What it names

Works cited
10.2489/jswc.66.3.78a

The comment

Please keep the Roadless Rule! We need to protect freshwater resources. Rescinding the rule would increase the likelihood of additional roads, with further dangers to water quality and to aquatic species. Literature synthesis shows roaded landscapes correlate with higher sediment loads, while roadless areas act as refugia for salmonids and freshwater biodiversity (DellaSala, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.3.78A).

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless