Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-475489

Opposes rescissionPosted September 23, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Coconino National ForestCoronado National ForestHiawatha National ForestHumboldt-Toiyabe National ForestHuron-Manistee National ForestInyo National ForestKaibab National ForestModoc National ForestOttawa National ForestUmatilla National Forest

The comment

As a firefighter, sportsman, and public lands owner in Nevada and Michigan, with respect I urge the rejection of this proposed roadless area rule. This rule would harm wildlife habitat and water quality in places my family and I use and care about like the Humboldt-Toiyabe NF, Coronado NF, Kaibab NF, Coconino NF, Inyo NF, Modoc NF, Umatilla NF, Huron-Manistee NF, Ottawa NF and Hiawatha NF and others. It will also likely increase risk of human-caused wildfires, most of which start near roads. This unwise, politically-motivated rule fails the broad public interest for conservation of US forests, watersheds and rural economies. Thank you, Daniel R Patterson, Indian River MI / Boulder City NV

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless