Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-485106

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “intact wildlife habitat”
    • “conserve their natural, undeveloped state”
    • “high-quality fish and wildlife habitat”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “use Wilderness Study Area backcountry”
    • “maintaining wilderness and backcountry character”
    • “hunting, fishing, and other backcountry pursuits”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “maintaining wilderness”
    • “conserve their natural, undeveloped state”
    • “keep these current policies”

What it names

Roadless areas
Wilderness Study Area

The comment

As an avid outdoorsman for over 6 decades, I hope to continually use Wilderness Study Area backcountry. Please keep these current policies focused on maintaining wilderness and backcountry character and intact wildlife habitat. It is crucial that these lands continue to be managed to conserve their natural, undeveloped state and the high-quality fish and wildlife habitat that make them so valuable to me and my family for hunting, fishing, and other backcountry pursuits. Thank you for your time regarding this very important matter. Gerry Maney

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless