Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-485143

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “use the Shoshone, Bighorn, Custer and Caribou-Targhee National Forest to recreate”
    • “recreate on dozens of times every year”
    • “use many modes of transportation”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “no need to change the roadless rule”
    • “Instead of getting rid of or changing the Roadless Rule”
    • “Please leave this alone”

What it names

National Forests
Caribou-Targhee National Forest

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter

The comment

There is no need to change the roadless rule. I live in Powell Wy and use the Shoshone, Bighorn, Custer and Caribou-Targhee National Forest to recreate on dozens of times every year. I use many modes of transportation. Instead of getting rid of or changing the Roadless Rule. How about we spend the money and maintain what we have. Please leave this alone!!!!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless