Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-486114

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Little Mountain

The comment

I am opposed to rescinding the Federal roadless rule on public lands. It is not needed for wildfire suppression. It will have a net result of increasing the occurrence of wildfires. The proposed change will jeopradize valuable species like salmon and put billions of dollars in tourism revenue at risk. Please maintain the Roadless Rule on public lands. Thank you, Stuart Greeter 125 River Trace Lane Little Mountain, SC 29075 803 331-7064 sgreeter77@earthlink.net

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless