Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-486474

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Stanislaus National Forest

The comment

We need to continue our current Roadless Rule, protecting our wilderness. Roadless areas are of great recreational value, providing a wild, quiet environment for visitors. I frequently visit the Stanislaus National Forest. The Forest Service already has many dirt roads throughout the forest, and they cannot adequately maintain them. It makes no sense to add more.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless