Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-497827

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “reject the rolling back of the Roadless rule for conservation”
- “critical wildlife habitat”
- “last intact landscapes in America”
Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “we both love and recreate in these areas”
- “world-class recreation opportunities”
- “beloved wild places in Oregon”
Resource Development Extraction
- “opened up to roadbuilding”
- “commercial logging”
- “development”
Water Quality Quantity
- “providing clean water”
- “Salmon River Trail”
- “Oregon Dunes on the coast”

What it names

Roadless areas: Hardesty MountainJoseph CanyonLookout MountainLost Lake

The comment

I wholeheartedly reject the rolling back of the Roadless rule for conservation. I am an Oregonian, and like all of us, we both love and recreate in these areas. This plan puts at risk beloved wild places in Oregon like Larch Mountain in the Gorge, Lost Lake and the Salmon River Trail in the Mount Hood National Forest, Hardesty Mountain outside Eugene, Tumalo Mountain outside Bend, Lookout Mountain in the Ochocos, the rugged canyonlands of Joseph Canyon in northeast Oregon, and the Oregon Dunes on the coast, among others. These are public lands and some of the last intact landscapes in America, providing clean water, critical wildlife habitat, and world-class recreation opportunities. And without the Roadless Rule, they could all be opened up to roadbuilding, commercial logging, and development.