Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-502716

Opposes rescissionPosted September 28, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “plant and animal species stay safe and undisturbed”
    • “disrupted and destroyed 3.2 million acres of fragile habitat”
    • “protects countless wild animals, including imperiled species”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “degrading clean water supplies”
    • “these lands provide clean water”
  • Public Opinion Support
    • “American public overwhelmingly supports the Roadless Rule”
    • “77% of voters support conserving roadless lands”
    • “over half a million Americans responded... with comments voicing strong opposition”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “limiting outdoor recreation opportunities”
    • “support numerous recreational activities”

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, This is our land and it is our duty to protect it! This rule was put in place to make sure that the plant and animal species stay safe and undisturbed from human destruction. I urge the U.S. Forest Service to keep intact the existing Roadless Area Conservation Rule (“Roadless Rule”), which protects nearly 45 million acres of our nation's forests and grasslands. Prior to the rule's implementation in 2001, industrial logging and accompanying roadbuilding disrupted and destroyed 3.2 million acres of fragile habitat annually while also degrading clean water supplies and limiting outdoor recreation opportunities. For a quarter century, the Roadless Rule has protected ecologically sensitive landscapes, wildlife populations and habitat, and communities dependent upon their services. The rule protects countless wild animals, including imperiled species who rely on intact habitats for survival. Additionally, these lands provide clean water and support numerous recreational activities that sustain local jobs and economies. The rule allows for flexibility in resource management, with exceptions for vegetation management and road construction projects in the interest of public health and safety. The American public overwhelmingly supports the Roadless Rule; recent bipartisan polling shows that 77% of voters support conserving roadless lands. Indeed, the rule was created with input from over 1.6 million comments and, in September, over half a million Americans responded to the U.S. Forest Service's notice of intent to repeal the Roadless Rule with comments voicing strong opposition. We have made our opinion clear time and time again–our public lands should remain public, not be degraded for the interests of private industry. I strongly urge the U.S. Forest Service not to repeal the Roadless Rule, as keeping the rule intact will protect our shared forestlands for generations to come. Ayn Zitzman 14377 Appletree Ln, MI 48430 Sincerely, Ayn Zitzman

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless