Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-505645

Opposes rescissionPosted September 29, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Attachments

5 files from Oregon Wild. Counts as 1,859 — Counted from the files: The enclosed submissions were counted from the files themselves.

  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions

The comment

The following is submitted on behalf of 1869 individuals who oppose the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule (see attached files). Repealing Roadless Area protections would devastate our public lands, waste taxpayer resources, and undermine the clean water, wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities that millions of Americans depend on. The agency should take Alternative 1, the No Action alternative, and leave current roadless protections in place.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless