Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-518753

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “My family hikes and fishes in these forests”
    • “negatively impact our ability to enjoy it”
    • “local and statewide tourism dollars”
    • “rely on tourism dollars of people who are visiting”

What it names

National Forests
Deschutes National ForestUmatilla National ForestWillamette National Forest

The comment

I oppose the proposal to revoke or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I live adjacent to the Mount Hood National Forest. The Willamette National Forest is a place I visit often along with the Deschutes National Forest. Family who live in eastern Oregon rely on tourism dollars of people who are visiting the Umatilla National Forest and Walla-Whitman National Forest. My family hikes and fishes in these forests and changing the Roadless Area Conservation Rule will negatively impact our ability to enjoy it and the local and statewide tourism dollars. It would be a mistake to rescind this rule.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless