Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-522068

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “recreate in these mountains”
    • “wild and quiet landscape”
    • “hike, camp, hunt, fish, pick huckleberries and mushrooms”
    • “visitors bring their dollars”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “abundant birds and wildlife”
    • “detrimental effect on the characteristics that I love”
    • “the quiet, the birds, and the wildlife”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “most wildfires are caused by people”
    • “creating new roads makes forests more vulnerable to human-caused fires”
    • “large old trees are the most fire resistant”
    • “make the forests more resistant to wildfire”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “visitors bring their dollars”
    • “vital part of our local economy”

What it names

National Forests
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest

The comment

September 30, 2006 Dear USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz, I am writing to express my strong opposition to rescinding or altering the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. My husband and I live in northeast Oregon, adjacent to Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, so I know this area well. There are many reasons why I am opposed to expanding roads in this forest (as well as our other national forests) but I will only mention three in this letter. First, like nearly everyone who lives in this region, I recreate in these mountains and I deeply appreciate what they provide: a wild and quiet landscape with abundant birds and wildlife. Increasing road-building, commercial logging, livestock grazing, and other extractive practices will have a very detrimental effect on the characteristics that I love: the quiet, the birds, and the wildlife. The forest will not be the same if this occurs. Second, I and other local residents are not the only people who cherish this forest. People come from around the state and elsewhere to hike, camp, hunt, fish, pick huckleberries and mushrooms, and to enjoy this landscape in myriad ways. These visitors bring their dollars, which are a vital part of our local economy. Third, ample research has shown that most wildfires are caused by people (either intentionally or non-intentionally) rather than lightening and occur near roads where people access the forests. Thus, creating new roads makes forests more vulnerable to human-caused fires. Additionally, large old trees are the most fire resistant, so eliminating protection of these trees, as has been proposed, reduces the forest’s ability to withstand fire. As you may be aware, this past summer was horrendous in terms of wildfire in Eastern Oregon. We spent nearly two months living with air quality that was frequently rated as very unhealthy and even hazardous. With hot and dry summers becoming the norm, we need to be doing all we can to make the forests more resistant to wildfire, and retaining the large old trees and not expanding road-building is one way to accomplish this. I urge you to keep the Roadless Rule in place, as it is. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nancy Findholt Cove, OR

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless