Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-522313

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “where we hike and camp”
    • “quiet and unspoiled”
    • “places dear to me and my family”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “important habitat for Oregon wildlife”
    • “bears, cougars, wildcats, deer, elk”
    • “habitat is destroyed by development”

What it names

National Forests
Ochoco National ForestWillamette National Forest

The comment

I object to removing the Roadless Rule, a rule that has protected places dear to me and my family for many years, where we hike and camp: Willamette National Forest, Mt Hood National Forest, Ochoco National Forest. We love these places because they are quiet and unspoiled. They are important habitat for Oregon wildlife--bears, cougars, wildcats, deer, elk--which we are already seeing increasingly in our towns as their nearby habitat is destroyed by development. Please do not revoke the Roadless Rule!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless