Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-522318

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “camped, climbed and hiked”
    • “hike up to an alpine lake”
    • “enjoyed the calm that comes from being in lands untouched by roads”
    • “experience northern Nevada the way my husband and I have”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “lands untouched by roads and industry”
    • “destroy these pristine areas”
    • “pristine areas of Nevada”

What it names

National Forests
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest
Roadless areas
Spring Creek

Attachments

8 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter
  • Own letter

The comment

My husband grew up in the ruby mountains of northern Nevada. He spent his childhood exploring and camping in the national forests of that area. I myself have camped, climbed and hiked in the ruby mountains and elsewhere in the Humboldt-Toiyabe national forest many times since we got married. A particular favorite was a hike up to an alpine lake in the ruby mountains, not far from spring creek, no. I’ve enjoyed the calm that comes from being in lands untouched by roads and industry. The proposed changes to this rule would make it easier to destroy these pristine areas of Nevada and elsewhere in our beautiful country. I would be devastated if my children did not get to experience northern Nevada the way my husband and I have.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless