Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-522453

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Every fallen tree and the smallest puddle feeds new growth, birds, insects, mammals that keep the forest alive”
    • “Take out any piece of the puzzle and the system no longer functions”
    • “Ancient forests can't be replaced by "new" ancient forests for hundreds to thousands of years”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “monetary loss of watershed”
    • “no redundant space in them to be used as roads”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “I have hiked in forested lands in Arizona, Utah, Alaska and California”
    • “tourism dollars”

What it names

National Forests
Coconino National Forest

The comment

Please do not rescind, roll back, or reduce the application of the Roadless Rule to our federal lands. I have hiked in forested lands in Arizona, Utah, Alaska and California (Coconino National Forest, Muir Woods, and many more), enough to learn that there is no redundant space in them to be used as roads or cleared for timber. Every fallen tree and the smallest puddle feeds new growth, birds, insects, mammals that keep the forest alive. Take out any piece of the puzzle and the system no longer functions. Ancient forests can't be replaced by "new" ancient forests for hundreds to thousands of years, and the result is desert. If nothing else, consider the monetary loss of watershed, tourism dollars, and research. DO NOT ROLL BACK THE ROADLESS RULE.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless