Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-522698

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “disrupted and destroyed 3.2 million acres of fragile habitat annually”
    • “protects countless wild animals, including imperiled species who rely on intact habitats for survival”
    • “We need less roads and more wild spaces for animals that are already fighting to survive”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “degrading clean water supplies”
    • “these lands provide clean water”
  • Public Opinion Support
    • “The American public overwhelmingly supports the Roadless Rule”
    • “recent bipartisan polling shows that 77% of voters support conserving roadless lands”
    • “over half a million Americans responded... with comments voicing strong opposition”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “limiting outdoor recreation opportunities”
    • “support numerous recreational activities that sustain local jobs and economies”

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I urge the U.S. Forest Service to keep intact the existing Roadless Area Conservation Rule (“Roadless Rule”), which protects nearly 45 million acres of our nation's forests and grasslands. Prior to the rule's implementation in 2001, industrial logging and accompanying roadbuilding disrupted and destroyed 3.2 million acres of fragile habitat annually while also degrading clean water supplies and limiting outdoor recreation opportunities. For a quarter century, the Roadless Rule has protected ecologically sensitive landscapes, wildlife populations and habitat, and communities dependent upon their services. The rule protects countless wild animals, including imperiled species who rely on intact habitats for survival. Additionally, these lands provide clean water and support numerous recreational activities that sustain local jobs and economies. The rule allows for flexibility in resource management, with exceptions for vegetation management and road construction projects in the interest of public health and safety. We need less roads and more wild spaces for animals that are already fighting to survive in a world where the natural environment is disappearing. The American public overwhelmingly supports the Roadless Rule; recent bipartisan polling shows that 77% of voters support conserving roadless lands. Indeed, the rule was created with input from over 1.6 million comments and, in September, over half a million Americans responded to the U.S. Forest Service's notice of intent to repeal the Roadless Rule with comments voicing strong opposition. We have made our opinion clear time and time again–our public lands should remain public, not be degraded for the interests of private industry. I strongly urge the U.S. Forest Service not to repeal the Roadless Rule, as keeping the rule intact will protect our shared forestlands for generations to come. Dana Atnip 1436 Pearson St., MI 48220 Sincerely, Dana Atnip

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless