Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-523041

Opposes rescissionPosted September 30, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, se01nsnn se01nsnn , As someone who cares deeply about national parks and the public lands that sustain them, I urge you to choose the No Action alternative and keep the Roadless Rule in place. For more than two decades, the rule has protected roughly 44.7 million acres of ecologically intact national forest lands, including areas near some of our nation's greatest national parks. Rescinding the rule would expose and fragment these treasured landscapes. Rescinding the rule opens a door that cannot be closed once wild areas are breached. New roads and development, fragmenting habitat, degrading waterways, puts our nation's treasured and irreplaceable landscapes at risk. Many public lands are already available for timber and energy development. Roadless protections apply to only about 30% of National Forest lands, making these remaining intact areas especially important for future generations. Please do not move forward with this unnecessary rollback. Keep the Roadless Rule in place to protect the forests, wildlife, clean water, and the national parks. Eleanor Brandt 3446 Johnson St NE Minneapolis, MN 55418-1411 Sincerely, Eleanor Brandt

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless