Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-533747

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “My family and I have gone to Lost Cove and Harper Creek for decades”
    • “It is my kids' favorite place in the whole world”
    • “wild character of these lands we treasure”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “New roads can fragment wildlife habitat”
    • “remove their roadless layer of protection”
    • “roadless buffer alongside the Lost Cove and Harper Creek WSAs”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “increase sedimentation”
    • “Upper Wilson Creek is a beautiful, wild area”

What it names

Roadless areas
Harper CreekLost CoveWilson Creek

The comment

My family and I have gone to Lost Cove and Harper Creek for decades. It is my kids' favorite place in the whole world, right here in North Carolina. These are both Wilderness Study Areas and Inventoried Roadless Areas. However, repealing the Roadless Rule would remove their roadless layer of protection, and that is a huge risk to this special place. The Upper Wilson Creek is a beautiful, wild area we MUST keep roadless. It helps provide a roadless buffer alongside the Lost Cove and Harper Creek WSAs. New roads can fragment wildlife habitat, increase sedimentation and diminish the wild character of these lands we treasure. Please do not change the rules and hurt this part of North Carolina we love so much.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless