Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-534102

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands”
    • “frequently visit the Experimental Forest trails”
    • “hiking is a hobby of mine”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
    • “maintain full protection for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas”

What it names

Roadless areas
Black Mountain

The comment

I am writing to express my strong opposition to any effort to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As an avid user and advocate for our nation’s public lands I rely heavily on the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I frequently visit the Experimental Forest trails near my home in Black Mountain. Protecting these in fragmented landscapes is deeply personal to me as hiking is a hobby of mine. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain full protection for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Sincerely, Pat Raso

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless