Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-535211

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “backpack on the Mountain-to-Sea Trail”
    • “untouched beauty of the area”
    • “place for many more generations to come”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “creeks and streams were so clean and clear”
    • “healthier than water sources I have seen in areas with many more roads”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Upper Wilson Creek Roadless Area”
    • “don't think we should remove the protections”
    • “keep this beautiful spot”

What it names

Roadless areas
Wilson Creek

The comment

I had the opportunity to backpack on the Mountain-to-Sea Trail in the Upper Wilson Creek Roadless Area. The untouched beauty of the area was a highlight for me. The creeks and streams were so clean and clear, much healthier than water sources I have seen in areas with many more roads. I don't think we should remove the protections and keep this beautiful spot a place for many more generations to come.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless