Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-535501

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands”
    • “frequently visit Pisgah National Forest”
    • “enjoy the hiking”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “observing wildlife habitat”
    • “integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas”
    • “protecting these unfragmented landscapes”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “strong opposition to any efforts to rescind”
    • “maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas”
    • “unfragmented landscapes”

What it names

National Forests
Pisgah National Forest
Roadless areas
Black Mountain

The comment

I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As an avid user and advocate for our nation's public lands, I rely heavily on the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I frequently visit Pisgah National Forest near my home in Black Mountain North Carolina. Protecting these unfragmented landscapes is deeply personal to me because I enjoy the hiking and observing wildlife habitat. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless