Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-540605

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “I regularly hike, swim, and birdwatch there”
    • “place for families to gather, fathers to fish and hunt with their kids”
    • “watch birds and other wildlife”
    • “emperil my ability to hike, swim, and birdwatch”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “opened for logging and other resource extraction”
    • “logging of our National Forests”
    • “threatened under the proposed changes”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “degrading water quality”
    • “2023 report published by Dr. Muhammad Sharif”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “bringing economic Stability”
    • “area relies heavily on Ecotourism”
    • “logging of our National Forests costs taxpayers $2 Billion dollars annually”

What it names

National Forests
Mendocino National Forest

The comment

To whom it may Concern: My name is Tyler of Kelseyville CA, and this is my comment on the proposed changes to the “Roadless Rule”. I live near Mendocino National Forest, an immensely beautiful natural space which would be threatened under the proposed changes. I regularly hike, swim, and birdwatch there, my favorite memory in this Forest is when I heard a “robot” sort of sound to only realize it was an Anna’s Hummingbird. Mendocino National Forest provides a place for families to gather, fathers to fish and hunt with their kids, and a place to watch birds and other wildlife (which is now counted as one of the most common forms of recreation among a Americans, with 1 in 3 regularly watching wildlife. ) All while bringing economic Stability - as our area relies heavily on Ecotourism. Under the proposed changes to the "Roadless Rule", Mendocino National Forest would be opened for logging and other resource extraction, which would emperil my ability to hike, swim, and birdwatch - if not completely stop me from doing so. Currently, the logging of our National Forests costs taxpayers $2 Billion dollars annually*, on top of degrading water quality**. ( * 2019 report by the Center for a Sustainable Economy. ** 2023 report published by Dr. Muhammad Sharif.) It is for these reasons (and more) that I oppose any and all changes to the “Roadless Rule”.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless