Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-541431

Supports rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Allegheny National Forest

The comment

I’m very much in favor of ending the Roadless Rule and opening up more of our national forests to managed logging and additional recreational activities. This is particularly true in the Allegheny National Forest where such activities, including gas and oil development, are important to the local economy, school districts and municipalities. Let’s end the Roadless Rule and get our forest back to producing a reliable timber supply as originally intended. Thank you for the opportunity to comment Sincerely, Bob Kirchner 167 Jackson Rd Saint Marys, PA 15857-3229 whynotbobk@yahoo.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless