Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-543339

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “weaken protections for roadless areas”
    • “Areas that are currently protected due to their roadless status should retain that protection”
    • “retain the option for for future wilderness status”

What it names

National Forests
Mark Twain National Forest

The comment

I oppose this scheme to weaken protections for roadless areas. I live in Missouri, and often visit existing roadless areas in the Mark Twain National Forest. Areas that are currently protected due to their roadless status should retain that protection, to retain the option for for future wilderness status.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless