Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-543439

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “hiking, trail running, mountain biking, climbing, and exploring”
    • “experience wildlife, solitude, clean air, dark skies”
    • “places that remain largely wild”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “deeply value the wild lands protected by this rule”
    • “permanently changing places that cannot be replaced once fragmented”
    • “protect these lands for future generations”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “We can address wildfire and forest health”
    • “without sacrificing some of Arizona's most treasured wild landscapes”

What it names

National Forests
Coronado National Forest

The comment

I strongly oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule. As a Tucson resident who spends much of my time hiking, trail running, mountain biking, climbing, and exploring Southern Arizona, I deeply value the wild lands protected by this rule. The Coronado National Forest’s roadless areas—including the Catalinas, Rincons, Santa Ritas, Whetstones, Cochise Stronghold, and Chiricahuas—are not just empty acres on a map. They are places where people experience wildlife, solitude, clean air, dark skies, and landscapes that remain largely wild. Removing these protections could open millions of acres to increased road construction and development, permanently changing places that cannot be replaced once fragmented. We can address wildfire and forest health without sacrificing some of Arizona’s most treasured wild landscapes. Please retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and protect these lands for future generations.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless