Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-543531

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “irreplaceable sanctuary for people looking to escape modern stresses”
    • “authentic backcountry experiences impossible to find near paved infrastructure”
    • “away from the noise and disruptions of motorized traffic”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “road construction severely fractures critical habitats”
    • “disrupts essential migration corridors”
    • “maintain the ecological connectivity that large mammals and delicate species need to thrive”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “building roads into pristine forests actually escalates fire risks”
    • “new roads can act as wind tunnels that fuel faster-moving blazes”
    • “keeping these lands roadless is a crucial strategy for forest resilience”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “safeguard municipal watersheds”
    • “prevent severe ecological degradation”

The comment

Sarah Grimes Barron and Christopher L Barron 94 Point Rd. Brunswick ME 04011 Ecosystem Management Coordination Attn: Roadless Area Conservation Proposed Rule U.S. Forest Service, USDA 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20250 Subject: Public Comment on Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation Proposed Rule (Docket FS-2025-0001) To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for maintaining the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I am strongly opposed to the proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Protected roadless wilderness provides irreplaceable sanctuary for people looking to escape modern stresses. These isolated areas allow outdoor enthusiasts to truly recharge and refresh themselves in Nature, away from the noise and disruptions of motorized traffic. Preserving these undeveloped landscapes ensures that future generations will continue to have access to authentic backcountry experiences impossible to find near paved infrastructure. Furthermore, intact roadless areas are vital for wildlife, as road construction severely fractures critical habitats and disrupts essential migration corridors. Roads create physical barriers that isolate animal populations, restrict access to foraging grounds, and increase vehicle collision risks. By preventing road building, we maintain the ecological connectivity that large mammals and delicate species need to thrive, ensuring wildlife can move freely and safely across public lands without human interference. Finally, keeping these lands roadless is a crucial strategy for forest resilience. Research shows that building roads into pristine forests actually escalates fire risks and subsequent damage by increasing human-caused ignitions and introducing invasive, flammable vegetation along clearings. Rather than improving safety, new roads can act as wind tunnels that fuel faster-moving blazes. Protecting our inventoried roadless areas is the most effective way to safeguard municipal watersheds and prevent severe ecological degradation. Thank you for considering my feedback on this critical matter. I urge the US Department of Agriculture and the Forest Service to protect these essential public lands and withdraw the proposed rescission. Sincerely, Sarah Grimes Barron and Christopher L Barron

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless