Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-544426

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Wildlife Habitat
- “helps animals have a place to live”
- “keep the Roadless Rule”
Forest Management Wildfire
- “There will be more wildfires if the Roadless Rule is repealed”
Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “It will be bad for the environment if it is repealed”
- “keep the Roadless Rule”

What it names

National Forests: Cibola National Forest

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

Own letter

The comment

I live in New Mexico. I am six years old. I like to climb trees and rocks in the National Forest. I also like to ski in the National Forest, I am attaching a picture of me and my friends cross country skiing in the Cibola National Forest. I think you should keep the Roadless Rule. The Roadless Rule helps animals have a place to live. There will be more wildfires if the Roadless Rule is repealed. It will be bad for the environment if it is repealed. We should keep the Roadless Rule.