Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-548506

Opposes rescissionPosted October 4, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Governance Policy Process
    • “retain the current Roadless Rule under Alternative 1”
    • “reject the proposed nationwide rescission under Alternative 2”
    • “any alternative that substantially weakens protections”

Attachments

20 files. Counts as 20 — Counted from the files: The enclosed submissions were counted from the files themselves.

  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions
  • Enclosed submissions

The comment

See attacAttached are comments from 20 people urging you to retain the current Roadless Rule under Alternative 1 and reject the proposed nationwide rescission under Alternative 2 and any alternative that substantially weakens protections. Thank you, Melissa Amarello, Executive Director Advocates for Snake Preservationhed file(s)

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless